Pow-Sys Güç Sistemleri logoPow-Sys Güç Sistemleri
Request a QuoteTürkçe
LV, MV and HV electrical services and power systems field application

Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies

Short-circuit analysis and relay selectivity for HV/MV systems: fault-current calculation, protection coordination, breaker rating and relay settings.

Engineering-FocusedField ExperienceStandards ComplianceEnergy EfficiencyFast Proposal24/7 SupportCertified TeamMeasurement & ReportingData-Driven Improvement
Panel and protection equipment assessment within the scope of short-circuit analysis and relay selectivity studies in HV/MV electrical systems
Field data verification and engineering assessment for short-circuit level and protection coordination.

Last updated: May 2026

What changed: Service scope, report outputs, official sources, pre-proposal information and technical transparency notes were reviewed for the current period.

Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies Summary

  • Maximum-minimum short-circuit current calculations and equipment withstand/breaking capacity verification in HV/MV systems
  • Relay selectivity (protection coordination) studies: time-current curves, tripping sequence and setting optimization
  • Technical suitability assessment of circuit breakers, fuses, MCCB/ACB devices, protection relays and contactors according to fault level
  • Analysis and reporting for new facilities, capacity increases, transformer replacement, generator/SPP integration and revision projects
  • Modelling with ETAP/similar software, field data verification, relay setting list preparation and commissioning support

Technically reviewed by

Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies Scope

What are short-circuit analysis and relay selectivity

Short-circuit analysis and relay selectivity studies are among the fundamental engineering studies for safe operation, equipment protection and energy continuity in electrical installations. Especially in industrial facilities, production lines, hospitals, data centers, shopping centers, hotels and large commercial buildings, it is difficult to ensure healthy operational safety without technically verifying which protection device will trip in which order during a fault. For related context, see Electrical Engineering Service and Technical Consultancy.

How is short-circuit analysis performed

What is short-circuit analysis Short-circuit analysis is the process of calculating expected fault currents in fault scenarios such as three-phase short circuit, phase-to-ground, phase-to-phase and two-phase-to-ground faults that may occur in an electrical system. These calculations are made by taking transformer rating and impedance, grid short-circuit power, cable lengths and cross-sections, motor contributions, generator/SPP contributions and system topology into account. For related context, see Periodic Inspection and Periodic Examination Service.

Relay selectivity and protection coordination

What is relay selectivity study Relay selectivity (protection coordination) study is the setting and coordination work that ensures the protection device closest to the fault trips first in the event of a fault, while upstream protection devices operate only when necessary. The aim is to isolate only the faulty zone without de-energizing the entire facility. For related context, see High Voltage Installations Engineering and Consultancy.

Why are these studies critical

Why are these studies important If the short-circuit level is calculated incorrectly, the selected circuit breaker or protection device may be insufficient during a fault. If selectivity is not performed correctly, the main circuit breaker may trip because of a small fault and the entire facility may be de-energized. This can lead to production loss, equipment damage, occupational safety risks and unplanned downtime costs. For related context, see Electrical Contracting Services.

Data collection and field verification

Within the scope of the service, first the single-line diagram, transformer data, MV/LV panel data, cable lists, protection device types, existing relay brand-model information and existing setting values, if available, are collected. Field data are compared with project documents; if there is missing or outdated information, it is revised for model accuracy.

Software modelling and operating scenarios

During the modelling stage, grid supply, transformers, generators, motor loads, cables, busbars and protection devices are represented in the software environment. Operating scenarios such as normal operation, generator supply, ring opening/closing condition and parallel transformer operation are evaluated separately, and fault currents are calculated for each scenario.

Breaker rating and equipment withstand verification

The outputs of short-circuit analysis are not limited to giving a fault-current value. The breaking capacity, thermal-dynamic withstand adequacy, busbar/cable stresses and suitability of the measuring ranges of protection devices are also checked. In this way, it becomes clear whether the equipment selection is sufficient from an engineering perspective.

TCC curves and relay setting optimization

In relay selectivity studies, protection relays, fuses, MCCB/ACB electronic trip units and, when necessary, motor protection devices are evaluated together. Tripping thresholds and delays are coordinated on time-current curves (TCC); overcurrent, short-circuit, earth fault and directional protection functions are optimized according to the application.

Special protection approach for critical loads

When carrying out a selectivity study, not only theoretical coordination but also operational priorities are taken into account. For example, continuity is prioritized on feeders supplying critical loads, while special protection approaches may be required for fire pumps, process safety loads, UPS supply paths or critical production lines. Therefore, the study is not a standard setting-copying task; it is an engineering optimization according to the facility's operating scenarios.

New facilities, capacity increases and revision projects

In new facility installations, short-circuit and selectivity studies are critical for correct equipment selection. In revision projects, after transformer capacity increase, panel replacement, new machine addition, generator integration or SPP connection, it must be checked whether the existing protection levels have been disrupted. Existing settings may become insufficient or overly sensitive after a system change.

Reporting and investment priorities

At the reporting stage, the assumptions and acceptances used, system model, short-circuit calculation results, equipment suitability assessment, coordination curves, relay setting recommendations and revision items to be implemented are presented clearly. If requested, the 'existing condition' and 'recommended condition' can be provided comparatively so that investment priorities can be determined.

Field implementation, testing and commissioning

Field implementation and commissioning support are also important parts of this service. To ensure that relay settings do not remain only in the report, coordination is provided with field teams, relay parameter entries are checked, a primary/secondary test plan is created if necessary, and the expected tripping behavior of protection functions is verified. In this way, the analysis study turns into a protection system that works in practice.

Selectivity in LV main distribution and MCC panels

Short-circuit analysis and relay selectivity studies make a major difference not only in MV systems but also in LV main distribution panels, MCC panels and critical sub-distribution systems. Especially in transformer-fed facilities with high short-circuit power, LV-side protection coordination can be vital to prevent fault propagation and preserve business continuity.

Pow-Sys service approach

As Pow-Sys Güç Sistemleri, we provide this service through a systematic process consisting of field data collection, single-line verification, software modelling, short-circuit calculations, protection coordination, relay setting optimization, reporting and field implementation support. According to the need, we can carry out the service in an integrated manner with relay tests, power quality measurements, harmonic analyses, thermal inspections and periodic maintenance works.

Proposal and study scope

If you would like to receive detailed information about short-circuit analysis and relay selectivity studies, request a technical assessment for your existing facility or ask for a proposal for your new project, you can contact us. When your single-line diagram and basic equipment list are shared, we can quickly clarify the scope and create an applicable work plan.

Reporting, Inspection and Proposal Preparation

Sample Inspection Table

This table summarizes which headings are evaluated on site and which outputs may appear in the report.

Inspected areaChecked criterionReport output
Site and equipment conditionExisting equipment structure, access conditions, visible risks and operating conditionsSite inspection note and prioritized findings list
Document and project conformitySingle-line diagram, current project, labeling, reports and conformity with site implementationDocument conformity assessment and missing record list
Safety and operational riskLife safety, equipment safety, energy continuity and maintenance access risk headingsRisk classification and corrective action recommendations
Measurement, test or inspection needMeasurement, test, visual inspection and technical review items required by the service scopeMeasurement/test plan or inspection scope note
Reporting and follow-upNonconformity priority, follow-up date, responsibility allocation and next stepsPhoto-supported report, action list and follow-up recommendation

Pow-Sys 5-Step Inspection and Follow-Up Workflow

Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies is carried out through preliminary review, risk classification, inspection planning, written action list and follow-up/closure logic.

StepOn-site assessmentRecorded output
Preliminary reviewFacility type, voltage level, main equipment, current project/report status and operational expectations are reviewed.Initial technical notes affecting the service scope are created.
Risk classificationLife safety, equipment safety, energy continuity and regulatory compliance are evaluated together.Priority risk headings and field inspection priority are determined.
Inspection and measurement planVisual inspection, testing, measurement, document review and reporting steps required by the service are planned.Site schedule, inspection scope and required record list are clarified.
Written action listDetected deficiencies are separated into actionable corrective items and follow-up dates.Nonconformity, risk level, responsible party and target date are entered into the report.
Follow-up and closurePrevious report items, completed works and continuing risks are compared during the next inspection.Closed/open items and the next inspection note are created.

Pow-Sys Anonymous Field Data Set

For Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies, facility type, frequent finding, risk type and Pow-Sys action are summarized without sharing real customer or facility names. No quantity or ratio is given where a real numerical record is not maintained.

Reviewed facility typeFrequent findingRisk typePow-Sys action
Industrial zone factoryOutdated single-line diagram or missing field labelIncorrect switching, maintenance confusion and project-site mismatchRevision note, label check and follow-up date are added to the report.
Privately supplied industrial facilityScattered maintenance, test or measurement recordsDelayed maintenance, recurring faults and weak audit readinessRecord organization need and prioritized action list are prepared.
Hospital, shopping mall or critical facilityUnclear critical load, emergency response and continuity planInterruption sensitivity, emergency uncertainty and operational riskCritical load note, separate test need and service scope recommendation are prepared.

Pow-Sys Field Observations and Anonymous Finding Headings

Without sharing real facility or company names, technical findings frequently encountered during field work are summarized below. No quantity or ratio is given where a real numerical record is not maintained.

Observation headingTypical site riskPow-Sys action
Outdated project or single-line recordA mismatch between site equipment and documents may increase the risk of wrong decisions, missing maintenance or incorrect switching.Revision need is stated in writing and document follow-up is recommended according to the current field condition.
Labeling and equipment identification gapsUnclear panel, switchgear, cable or equipment names may create confusion for field personnel.Labeling, equipment identification and instruction updates are added to the action list.
Scattered maintenance, test or measurement recordsUntraceable historical records may cause recurring faults, delayed maintenance and audit preparation problems.Report history, follow-up date and records to be completed are written as separate items.
Need for measurement or separate testingGrounding, thermal imaging, relay testing or insulation testing may require separate planning outside the main service.Separately planned test/measurement headings and priority level are added to the report.

Which Service Is Needed? Decision Matrix

During Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies, some findings are reported within the main service scope while some findings may require separate testing, measurement, maintenance or project work.

SymptomLikely needSeparate service needed?Pow-Sys recommendation
Document and site mismatchProject revision, single-line diagram update or labeling workMay be requiredReported in the main service; implementation/revision is planned under a separate scope.
Old measurement or test recordGrounding measurement, thermal imaging, relay test, insulation test or power quality measurementUsually planned separatelyMeasurement/test need, priority level and follow-up date are written in the report.
Equipment fault or maintenance findingTransformer maintenance, panel maintenance, cable/termination check or fault-maintenance-test workMay be a separate serviceMaintenance or implementation need is evaluated separately from the main proposal scope.
Regulatory and reporting gapAuthorized engineer assessment, report follow-up and official-source-based reviewEvaluated within the main serviceCurrent regulation note, report output and responsibility boundary are made visible.

On-Page Tool and Document Previews

Sample tools used during proposal, site visit and reporting are summarized on the page instead of being left only as download links.

ToolOn-page previewPurposeOutput
Pre-survey information formFacility type, location, transformer/main equipment, existing reports and expected visit frequencyClarifying proposal scopeMore accurate survey and proposal plan
Pre-inspection checklistProject, field equipment, safety, maintenance records and measurement/test needAvoiding missed headings during the first site visitList of reviewed criteria
Action tracking tableNonconformity, risk level, responsible party, target date and closure statusKeeping open items traceableTrackable corrective action list
Sample report templateGeneral condition, photo finding, risk level, corrective action and follow-up dateShowing the report format in advanceTechnical report preview
Proposal scope checklistIncluded items, separately planned works, information provided by the employer and emergency support noteMaking contract scope transparentIncluded / separate service distinction

Anonymous Field Case Examples

The following examples show field experience, measurable output and follow-up approach without sharing customer name, facility name, serial number or sensitive operational information.

Anonymous field example - Turkey-wide production facility

Date
May 2026
Facility type
Privately transformer-fed production facility
Anonymous tracking code
role-selektivite-anonymous-case-2026-01
Previous condition
Existing project documents, field labels and maintenance records were not followed in a single file structure.
Finding
Within Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies, project-site consistency, equipment identification and historical report records included items requiring follow-up.
Action
Nonconformities were separated by risk level; items requiring measurement/testing or maintenance were added to a separate action list.
Measurable output
3 documentation items, 2 equipment identification items and 1 separate measurement/test need were made visible in report format.
Follow-up result
Open items were classified by first follow-up date and next inspection heading.
Limit / note
Customer name, facility name and sensitive technical details are not shared due to privacy and confidentiality.

Anonymous field example - Turkey-wide critical facility

Date
April 2026
Facility type
Hospital, shopping mall or high interruption-sensitivity commercial facility
Anonymous tracking code
role-selektivite-anonymous-case-2026-02
Previous condition
Critical loads, emergency response expectation and report output scope had not been clarified.
Finding
Power continuity, maintenance access and separate testing need were evaluated together.
Action
Critical headings were written into the report; test/measurement topics to be planned separately were separated from the proposal scope.
Measurable output
2 critical load notes, 1 emergency contact heading and 1 separate test recommendation were written down.
Follow-up result
The site decision was tied to the follow-up plan through authorized engineer assessment and facility management approval.
Limit / note
Final risk level and contract scope are not finalized without an on-site survey.

Anonymous field example - Turkey-wide industrial zone facility

Date
March 2026
Facility type
Privately transformer-fed business in an industrial zone
Anonymous tracking code
role-selektivite-anonymous-case-2026-03
Previous condition
Maintenance records were kept in different files and previous report open items were not tracked in one list.
Finding
Open follow-up items, completed works and separately planned measurement/test headings were separated.
Action
An action tracking table was created; responsible party, target date and closure status fields were added to the report.
Measurable output
4 open follow-up items, 2 closure notes and 1 next inspection date were recorded.
Follow-up result
Closed/open items were planned to be compared during the next visit.
Limit / note
These examples show the anonymized field experience format used by Pow-Sys.

Evidence Assets and Verification Points

The evidence, certificate and field output areas used on the Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies page are shown together with how users can verify them.

Evidence assetHow it appears on the pageTrust contribution
Authorization and certificate transparencyTechnical reviewer box, EMO/SMM information, certificates page and EMO verification linkMakes Expertise and Authority signals visible.
Anonymized field case recordsFacility type, finding, action, measurable output and follow-up resultStrengthens Experience and original field-practice signals.
Anonymized masked report previewReport content, inspection heading, field check point, output, follow-up date fields and printable anonymized report preview documentHelps users understand the expected deliverable before requesting service.
Official source mappingTechnical claim, official basis and page section are shown in the same table.Improves Referenceability and Trust.
Update and correction trailLast updated date, change note, update history and correction policy linkShows that the content is current, auditable and responsibly maintained.

Proposal Scope: Included / Planned Separately

For Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies, included items and additional works that may be planned as separate services are stated clearly in the proposal.

ScopeStatusExplanation
Site survey and preliminary assessmentIncluded depending on proposalPlanned to clarify the service scope and site need.
Periodic site visit and written action reportIncludedFindings, risk level and follow-up notes are prepared according to the contract/service scope.
Grounding measurement, thermal imaging, relay testing or transformer oil analysisCan be planned separatelyQuoted as a separate test/measurement work when required.
Revision, implementation, material supply or maintenance-repairSeparate serviceImplementation needs arising from the report are evaluated under a separate scope.

Out-of-Scope and Separately Planned Works

Short-Circuit Analysis and Relay Selectivity Studies produces technical follow-up, reporting, compliance assessment and risk notification. The following works are planned separately when required; final risk level, cost and scope are not confirmed without an on-site survey.

Out-of-scope / separate workWhy is it evaluated separately?Pow-Sys approach
Grounding measurementIt may require measurement equipment, site time and a separate report.The need is stated in the main report; measurement work is planned separately.
Relay testing and selectivityRelay settings, test equipment, outage planning and separate engineering assessment may be required.Quoted as a separate testing/selectivity service when needed.
Thermal imaging inspectionIt requires imaging under load and a separate thermal finding report.Planned separately for panels, switchgear or connections where risk is observed.
Transformer maintenance and oil analysisIt may require maintenance crew, sampling, laboratory work or a separate test procedure.The need is written in the technical report; maintenance/testing is prepared as a separate scope.
Project revision, implementation and physical remediationIt creates material, labor, authority process or implementation responsibility.The main service reports the finding; implementation and contracting works are handled separately.

Claim and Official Source Mapping

Technical and regulatory statements are evaluated together with the official sources listed on the page. This table makes the relation between each claim and its supporting basis visible.

SourceClaim supported on the pageWhere it is used
EMO certificate verification and SMM/YGTIS sourcesAuthorized engineer assessment, certificate transparency and authorization confirmation are required at service start.Technical reviewer, authorization, certificate verification and proposal preparation sections.
Applicable electrical installation regulationsFinal site decision is clarified through on-site review, current documents and authorized engineer assessment.Information note, out-of-scope works and field data methodology sections.
TS EN, IEC, TEDAS, TEIAS, utility or relevant authority processesTesting, measurement, maintenance, authority approval or implementation works may be planned separately.Decision matrix, proposal scope, official sources and report output sections.

Update History and Editorial Review

Pow-Sys service pages are periodically reviewed for regulatory, technical practice and field reporting topics. If inaccurate or outdated information is noticed, reports are received through the correction policy.

DateWhat changed?Where is it shown?
May 2026Service scope, report outputs, pre-proposal information and trust notes were reviewed for the current period.Shown in the 'Last updated', 'What changed?' and update history areas.
After a correction requestInaccurate, incomplete or outdated information is technically reviewed.Necessary corrections are updated as page text, source links or explanatory notes.
Time-current curve (TCC) coordination analysis for relay selectivity study
Protection coordination and setting optimization through time-current curves.
Anonymous technical report, checklist and follow-up output example
Standard report/control output: field finding, risk level, corrective action and follow-up date shown together.

Official Regulatory Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

What is short-circuit analysis and what is it used for?

Short-circuit analysis is an engineering study that calculates expected fault currents during faults that may occur in an electrical system. With this study, the adequacy of circuit breakers, fuses, busbars, cables and other equipment against the fault level is checked; the risk of incorrect equipment selection and damage during a fault is reduced.

Why is relay selectivity (protection coordination) study necessary?

A selectivity study aims to de-energize only the faulty zone during a fault. If correct coordination is not made, upstream protection devices far from the fault may trip and the entire facility may be shut down. This creates unnecessary energy interruption, production loss and operational risk.

In which facilities should short-circuit and selectivity studies be carried out?

This study is recommended for transformer substations, industrial facilities, factories, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels, data centers, large commercial buildings and all MV/LV electrical systems containing critical loads. In addition, after transformer capacity increase, panel revision, generator/SPP integration or new machine addition, the study should be updated.

What information is required for this study?

Generally, single-line diagram, transformer rating and impedance data, grid short-circuit data if available, panel and circuit breaker brand-model information, cable lengths/cross-sections, relay types, existing relay settings and operating scenarios are required. Missing data or inconsistencies can be completed by field verification.

Is it mandatory to use ETAP?

ETAP is a common and powerful analysis platform; however, short-circuit and selectivity studies can also be carried out with different engineering software. What matters is that the methods used are correct, the model represents the field, and the output is converted into an applicable technical report and setting list.

What outputs are delivered at the end of the study?

Depending on the scope, short-circuit calculation results (maximum/minimum fault currents), equipment suitability assessment, time-current curves (TCC), selectivity/coordination comments, relay setting recommendation lists, revision recommendations and an engineering report are delivered. Field implementation and testing support can also be provided if requested.

Can selectivity be achieved without changing existing relay settings?

In some facilities, existing settings may be sufficient; however, in many cases optimization is required due to system changes, different equipment characteristics or incorrect historical settings. As a result of the study, whether existing settings should be retained, revised or equipment replacement should be recommended is determined according to technical data.

Are short-circuit analysis and arc flash analysis the same thing?

No. Short-circuit analysis and selectivity study evaluate fault-current levels and protection coordination. Arc flash analysis focuses on determining possible arc energy levels, approach distances and PPE requirements. However, short-circuit and protection data are important inputs for arc flash studies.

When should the study be updated?

Short-circuit and selectivity studies should be reviewed again when a transformer is replaced or its rating is increased, a new panel or feeder is added, generator/SPP integration is performed, a large motor is added, protection equipment is changed or significant changes are made in the operating topology. Otherwise, existing settings may not be suitable for the new system.

Can relay selectivity study be carried out together with field tests?

Yes. The healthiest approach is to carry out analysis, setting recommendation, field parameter implementation and relay test/verification steps together. In this way, it is checked that the protection behavior recommended in the report actually occurs in the field, and commissioning is completed safely.

Can short-circuit analysis be performed if the single-line diagram is not up to date?

Yes, but field verification is required first. Transformer, panel, circuit breaker, fuse, relay, cable and load data are checked on site; building a reliable model without updating the single-line diagram according to the actual installation is not the correct approach.

Is selectivity study also required for LV main distribution panels?

Yes. Especially in transformer-fed facilities, LV main distribution panels, MCC panels and critical sub-distribution feeders may have high short-circuit levels. If MCCBs, ACBs, fuses and protection relays are not coordinated correctly, a small fault may de-energize a wider area.

Let us bring your project to life together.

Contact us now for a site survey and preliminary discussion.

Contact Us