Pow-Sys Güç Sistemleri logoPow-Sys Güç Sistemleri
Request a QuoteTürkçe
LV, MV and HV electrical services and power systems field application

Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection

Fire detection system periodic inspection in Bursa: fire alarm panel, detector, sounder, strobe testing and official reporting.

Engineering-FocusedField ExperienceStandards ComplianceEnergy EfficiencyFast Proposal24/7 SupportCertified TeamMeasurement & ReportingData-Driven Improvement
Electrical engineer performing function and conformity tests on a fire alarm panel during addressable fire detection and alarm system periodic inspection in Bursa
In fire detection system periodic inspection, the panel, detectors, call points, sounders, strobes and equipment linked to the fire scenario are tested step by step and the results are documented with an engineer-signed report.

Last updated: May 2026

What changed: Service scope, report outputs, official sources, pre-proposal information and technical transparency notes were reviewed for the current period.

Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection Summary

  • Periodic inspection of addressable and conventional fire detection and alarm systems in Bursa in line with legislation and the TS EN 54-14 approach
  • Fire alarm panel, smoke detector, heat detector, flame detector, beam detector, manual call point, sounder, strobe, loop and zone checks
  • Reporting according to the Regulation on Fire Protection of Buildings, the Regulation on Health and Safety Conditions in the Use of Work Equipment and relevant standards
  • Site-specific inspection plans for facilities in Nilufer, DOSAB, NOSAB, Hasanaga, Kayapa, Kestel, Gursu and Inegol organized industrial zones
  • Authorized persons meeting EKİPNET registration requirements, calibrated test devices, nonconformity list and engineer-approved periodic inspection report
  • Integrated planning of fire detection inspection with electrical installation, grounding, generator, battery and other periodic inspections

Technically reviewed by

Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection Scope

What is fire detection periodic inspection in Bursa

Fire detection and alarm system periodic inspection is the process of checking and reporting the panel, detectors, manual call points, sounders, strobes, power supply, loop/zone lines and fire scenarios at defined intervals according to legislation, relevant standards and manufacturer instructions. The aim is to verify that the system can perform early detection, correct warning, safe evacuation and required automation outputs reliably during an actual fire. For related context, see Bursa Electrical Installation Periodic Inspection.

In industrial facilities, OIZ factories, shopping centers, hospitals, hotels, schools, warehouses, public buildings and large commercial properties in Bursa, a fire detection system should not be considered safe merely because it is installed. Detector contamination, disabled points, weak batteries, incorrect scenarios, insufficient sounder audibility or faulty loop wiring may cause delayed detection and evacuation delay in a real fire. For related context, see Bursa Lightning Protection Periodic Inspection.

Fire detection system periodic inspection is evaluated by considering Law No. 6331 on Occupational Health and Safety, the Regulation on Health and Safety Conditions in the Use of Work Equipment, the Regulation on Fire Protection of Buildings and the relevant TS EN 54 standard family. The Regulation on Fire Protection of Buildings defines periodic inspection, testing and maintenance of fire detection and warning systems according to the relevant standards as an important responsibility of the building owner, manager or authorized building representative. For related context, see Bursa Transformer Maintenance, Testing, Oil Analysis and Fault Repair.

The TS EN 54-14 approach provides a technical framework for the planning, design, installation, commissioning, use, maintenance and inspection processes of fire detection and alarm systems. Work equipment legislation is also important because periodic inspection must be carried out by authorized persons, documented and kept available for official audits. For related context, see Bursa Electrical Contracting Services.

How is the inspection interval determined

Annual comprehensive periodic inspection is taken as the baseline for fire detection and alarm systems; if manufacturer instructions, the relevant standard, facility risk analysis or insurance/OIZ/authority requirements define a shorter interval, that interval should be followed. Interim function checks can be planned for chemical, textile, plastic, paper, logistics warehouse, intensive production, hospital and data center facilities where fire risk or evacuation sensitivity is high.

Monthly visual checks, panel fault indications, power-supply status and disabled points can be followed by the business. Quarterly or six-monthly interim checks may test selected detectors, call points, sounders, strobes and scenario functions. The annual periodic inspection is completed with wider sampling, loop/zone checks, battery and power-supply assessment, integration tests and official reporting.

Which equipment is inspected

The inspection covers the fire alarm panel, repeater panel, communication modules, main and backup power supplies, batteries, smoke detectors, heat detectors, flame detectors, beam detectors, manual fire call points, sounders, strobes, audible-visual warning devices, loop lines, zones, cable routes and field connections.

The system may be addressable or conventional. In addressable systems, each detector and call point is checked to verify that it appears on the panel with the correct address. In conventional systems, zone-based alarm, fault and cable continuity are assessed. In both system types, the main objective is to detect fire at the earliest possible stage and reliably report the correct area.

Site preparation and document review

Before starting on site, the fire detection project, as-built drawings, panel brand and model information, loop/zone lists, detector and call point quantities, previous periodic inspection reports, maintenance records, fault records and fire scenario matrix are reviewed. These documents help determine which points are critical, which integrations must be prioritized and which areas have higher risk during field testing.

The test plan is prepared by considering the facility's production order, shift hours, evacuation plan, enclosed-area density, dust/humidity/temperature conditions and critical equipment. Sounder tests, elevator recall, smoke extraction, door holders and gas extinguishing integrations are performed in a controlled manner in coordination with facility representatives.

Panel, power supply and battery checks

Normal, alarm, fault, disabled, test and bypass states are reviewed on the fire alarm panel. Main power supply, backup power supply, battery voltages, charging circuit, panel event logs, loop/zone conditions, communication modules and repeater panels are checked. Points that continuously produce faults, are disabled or cannot be clearly matched with the field are listed separately in the report.

Battery and backup power condition is critical for continuity of the fire detection system. During a mains power failure, the panel, detectors and warning devices are expected to operate for the required duration. Therefore, battery voltage, connection condition, charging circuit and ageing signs are checked; where needed, a more detailed battery periodic inspection can be planned separately.

Detector, call point and warning device tests

Smoke detectors are tested with suitable test aerosols, heat detectors with a controlled heat source, and flame and beam detectors according to manufacturer instructions. During testing, whether the detector generates an alarm, whether it appears on the panel with the correct address or zone, response delay, contamination level and false alarm risk are assessed.

For manual fire call points, mechanical operation, accessibility, glass or reset element condition and correct alarm creation on the panel are checked. For sounders and strobes, activation, audibility, visibility, regional alarm logic and compatibility with the fire scenario are assessed. Missing, weak or incorrectly operating warning devices are reported as priority nonconformities for evacuation safety.

Scenario and integration tests

In many facilities, the fire detection system does not only generate an alarm; it interacts with elevator recall, smoke extraction, pressurization, door holders, turnstiles, gas extinguishing, sprinkler alarm, fire pump room signal, emergency announcement and building automation systems. Therefore, periodic inspection verifies whether fire scenarios produce the expected results not only on the panel but also on connected systems.

Scenario tests are planned by considering the production and usage conditions of the facility. The aim is to use controlled tests close to real fire behavior to verify that the alarm indicates the correct area, required warnings are generated, related equipment moves to the expected position and unnecessary activation or missing triggering risks are eliminated.

Cable, loop and insulation checks

Cable continuity, loop integrity, short circuit, open circuit, earth leakage, line resistance and insulation condition directly affect fire detection system reliability. Cable-related fault risk may increase especially in production areas, humid areas, cable trays, field transitions and areas that have undergone renovation.

During loop and zone checks, panel fault records, field connections and cable routes are evaluated together. Where required, insulation resistance, continuity and earth leakage checks are performed to verify the electrical integrity of the detection line. Identified cable, connection or field-device issues are clearly included in the report.

Fire detection periodic inspection report

At the end of the inspection, a fire detection system periodic inspection form, test results, inspected equipment list, panel and field observations, measurement results, fire scenario assessment, nonconformity list and corrective action recommendations are prepared. The report is written clearly enough to be used in Ministry of Labor, fire brigade, OIZ administration, insurance audits and occupational health and safety files.

Each nonconformity is classified according to its severity. Detector contamination, faulty call point, non-operating sounder, weak battery, missing scenario, disabled zone, incorrect addressing, insufficient audibility or integration failure are documented with practical corrective action recommendations. If necessary, the need for retesting after correction is also stated.

Authorized persons and EKİPNET registration

Periodic inspections of fire detection and alarm systems should be carried out by persons authorized to perform periodic inspections under the relevant legislation and meeting EKİPNET registration requirements. In practice, authorized persons from relevant technical disciplines such as electrical, electrical-electronics, electronics and communications should use calibrated test devices and appropriate inspection methods when preparing the report.

When selecting a service provider, not only price but also the competence of the person performing the inspection, EKİPNET registration status, calibration of test devices, conformity of the report format with regulations, experience in fire detection systems and scenario/integration knowledge should be evaluated together. This approach makes the report understandable and defensible during audits.

Service scope for facilities in Bursa

We plan Bursa fire detection periodic inspection services for industrial facilities, organized industrial zones, shopping centers, hospitals, hotels, schools, logistics warehouses, cold storage facilities, public buildings and campus structures in Bursa, especially in Nilufer, Osmangazi, Yildirim, Gursu, Kestel, Inegol, Gemlik, Mudanya, Karacabey and Mustafakemalpasa.

In industrially dense areas such as Nilufer OSB, DOSAB, NOSAB, Hasanaga, Kayapa, Demirtas, Kestel, Gursu and Inegol OSB, fire detection system periodic inspection is especially important for production continuity, occupational safety, insurance processes and official audits. The inspection plan is prepared according to each facility's risk profile and operating order.

How is pricing determined

Fire detection system periodic inspection price is determined according to panel brand and model, number of loops and zones, number of detectors, call points, sounders and strobes, number of buildings, number of floors, field access, integration scope, whether the test will be performed outside production hours and reporting detail.

To prepare a clear proposal, panel information, device list, number of loops/zones, facility layout plan, existing maintenance records and, if available, previous fire detection periodic inspection report are reviewed. After a site survey or preliminary information assessment, an understandable proposal is prepared according to the actual size of the system.

Integrated periodic inspection plan

Fire detection periodic inspection produces more efficient results when planned together with the facility's other electrical and safety inspections. Handling electrical installation, grounding, lightning protection, generator, battery, transformer and fire detection checks within the same periodic inspection calendar organizes the audit file and allows mutually related risks to be seen as a whole.

As Pow-Sys Güç Sistemleri, we evaluate fire detection and warning systems in Bursa not only by device, but also together with electrical supply, evacuation scenario, fire safety, maintenance history and operational continuity. This turns the report from a mere formality into a technical document that contributes to the facility's real safety plan.

Reporting, Inspection and Proposal Preparation

Sample Inspection Table

This table summarizes which headings are evaluated on site and which outputs may appear in the report.

Inspected areaChecked criterionReport output
Site and equipment conditionExisting equipment structure, access conditions, visible risks and operating conditionsSite inspection note and prioritized findings list
Document and project conformitySingle-line diagram, current project, labeling, reports and conformity with site implementationDocument conformity assessment and missing record list
Safety and operational riskLife safety, equipment safety, energy continuity and maintenance access risk headingsRisk classification and corrective action recommendations
Measurement, test or inspection needMeasurement, test, visual inspection and technical review items required by the service scopeMeasurement/test plan or inspection scope note
Reporting and follow-upNonconformity priority, follow-up date, responsibility allocation and next stepsPhoto-supported report, action list and follow-up recommendation

Pow-Sys 5-Step Inspection and Follow-Up Workflow

Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection is carried out through preliminary review, risk classification, inspection planning, written action list and follow-up/closure logic.

StepOn-site assessmentRecorded output
Preliminary reviewFacility type, voltage level, main equipment, current project/report status and operational expectations are reviewed.Initial technical notes affecting the service scope are created.
Risk classificationLife safety, equipment safety, energy continuity and regulatory compliance are evaluated together.Priority risk headings and field inspection priority are determined.
Inspection and measurement planVisual inspection, testing, measurement, document review and reporting steps required by the service are planned.Site schedule, inspection scope and required record list are clarified.
Written action listDetected deficiencies are separated into actionable corrective items and follow-up dates.Nonconformity, risk level, responsible party and target date are entered into the report.
Follow-up and closurePrevious report items, completed works and continuing risks are compared during the next inspection.Closed/open items and the next inspection note are created.

Pow-Sys Bursa Anonymous Field Data Set

For Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection, facility type, frequent finding, risk type and Pow-Sys action are summarized without sharing real customer or facility names. No quantity or ratio is given where a real numerical record is not maintained.

Reviewed facility typeFrequent findingRisk typePow-Sys action
Industrial zone factoryOutdated single-line diagram or missing field labelIncorrect switching, maintenance confusion and project-site mismatchRevision note, label check and follow-up date are added to the report.
Privately supplied industrial facilityScattered maintenance, test or measurement recordsDelayed maintenance, recurring faults and weak audit readinessRecord organization need and prioritized action list are prepared.
Hospital, shopping mall or critical facilityUnclear critical load, emergency response and continuity planInterruption sensitivity, emergency uncertainty and operational riskCritical load note, separate test need and service scope recommendation are prepared.

Pow-Sys Field Observations and Anonymous Finding Headings

Without sharing real facility or company names, technical findings frequently encountered during field work in Bursa and nearby industrial areas are summarized below. No quantity or ratio is given where a real numerical record is not maintained.

Observation headingTypical site riskPow-Sys action
Outdated project or single-line recordA mismatch between site equipment and documents may increase the risk of wrong decisions, missing maintenance or incorrect switching.Revision need is stated in writing and document follow-up is recommended according to the current field condition.
Labeling and equipment identification gapsUnclear panel, switchgear, cable or equipment names may create confusion for field personnel.Labeling, equipment identification and instruction updates are added to the action list.
Scattered maintenance, test or measurement recordsUntraceable historical records may cause recurring faults, delayed maintenance and audit preparation problems.Report history, follow-up date and records to be completed are written as separate items.
Need for measurement or separate testingGrounding, thermal imaging, relay testing or insulation testing may require separate planning outside the main service.Separately planned test/measurement headings and priority level are added to the report.

Which Service Is Needed? Decision Matrix

During Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection, some findings are reported within the main service scope while some findings may require separate testing, measurement, maintenance or project work.

SymptomLikely needSeparate service needed?Pow-Sys recommendation
Document and site mismatchProject revision, single-line diagram update or labeling workMay be requiredReported in the main service; implementation/revision is planned under a separate scope.
Old measurement or test recordGrounding measurement, thermal imaging, relay test, insulation test or power quality measurementUsually planned separatelyMeasurement/test need, priority level and follow-up date are written in the report.
Equipment fault or maintenance findingTransformer maintenance, panel maintenance, cable/termination check or fault-maintenance-test workMay be a separate serviceMaintenance or implementation need is evaluated separately from the main proposal scope.
Regulatory and reporting gapAuthorized engineer assessment, report follow-up and official-source-based reviewEvaluated within the main serviceCurrent regulation note, report output and responsibility boundary are made visible.

On-Page Tool and Document Previews

Sample tools used during proposal, site visit and reporting are summarized on the page instead of being left only as download links.

ToolOn-page previewPurposeOutput
Pre-survey information formFacility type, location, transformer/main equipment, existing reports and expected visit frequencyClarifying proposal scopeMore accurate survey and proposal plan
Pre-inspection checklistProject, field equipment, safety, maintenance records and measurement/test needAvoiding missed headings during the first site visitList of reviewed criteria
Action tracking tableNonconformity, risk level, responsible party, target date and closure statusKeeping open items traceableTrackable corrective action list
Sample report templateGeneral condition, photo finding, risk level, corrective action and follow-up dateShowing the report format in advanceTechnical report preview
Proposal scope checklistIncluded items, separately planned works, information provided by the employer and emergency support noteMaking contract scope transparentIncluded / separate service distinction

Anonymous Field Case Examples

The following examples show field experience, measurable output and follow-up approach without sharing customer name, facility name, serial number or sensitive operational information.

Anonymous field example - Bursa production facility

Date
May 2026
Facility type
Privately transformer-fed production facility
Anonymous tracking code
bursa-yangin-periyodik-kontrol-anonymous-case-2026-01
Previous condition
Existing project documents, field labels and maintenance records were not followed in a single file structure.
Finding
Within Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection, project-site consistency, equipment identification and historical report records included items requiring follow-up.
Action
Nonconformities were separated by risk level; items requiring measurement/testing or maintenance were added to a separate action list.
Measurable output
3 documentation items, 2 equipment identification items and 1 separate measurement/test need were made visible in report format.
Follow-up result
Open items were classified by first follow-up date and next inspection heading.
Limit / note
Customer name, facility name and sensitive technical details are not shared due to privacy and confidentiality.

Anonymous field example - Bursa critical facility

Date
April 2026
Facility type
Hospital, shopping mall or high interruption-sensitivity commercial facility
Anonymous tracking code
bursa-yangin-periyodik-kontrol-anonymous-case-2026-02
Previous condition
Critical loads, emergency response expectation and report output scope had not been clarified.
Finding
Power continuity, maintenance access and separate testing need were evaluated together.
Action
Critical headings were written into the report; test/measurement topics to be planned separately were separated from the proposal scope.
Measurable output
2 critical load notes, 1 emergency contact heading and 1 separate test recommendation were written down.
Follow-up result
The site decision was tied to the follow-up plan through authorized engineer assessment and facility management approval.
Limit / note
Final risk level and contract scope are not finalized without an on-site survey.

Anonymous field example - Bursa industrial zone facility

Date
March 2026
Facility type
Privately transformer-fed business in an industrial zone
Anonymous tracking code
bursa-yangin-periyodik-kontrol-anonymous-case-2026-03
Previous condition
Maintenance records were kept in different files and previous report open items were not tracked in one list.
Finding
Open follow-up items, completed works and separately planned measurement/test headings were separated.
Action
An action tracking table was created; responsible party, target date and closure status fields were added to the report.
Measurable output
4 open follow-up items, 2 closure notes and 1 next inspection date were recorded.
Follow-up result
Closed/open items were planned to be compared during the next visit.
Limit / note
These examples show the anonymized field experience format used by Pow-Sys.

Evidence Assets and Verification Points

The evidence, certificate and field output areas used on the Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection page are shown together with how users can verify them.

Evidence assetHow it appears on the pageTrust contribution
Authorization and certificate transparencyTechnical reviewer box, EMO/SMM information, certificates page and EMO verification linkMakes Expertise and Authority signals visible.
Anonymized field case recordsFacility types in Bursa and nearby areas, finding, action, measurable output and follow-up resultStrengthens Experience and original field-practice signals.
Anonymized masked report previewReport content, inspection heading, field check point, output, follow-up date fields and printable anonymized report preview documentHelps users understand the expected deliverable before requesting service.
Official source mappingTechnical claim, official basis and page section are shown in the same table.Improves Referenceability and Trust.
Update and correction trailLast updated date, change note, update history and correction policy linkShows that the content is current, auditable and responsibly maintained.

Proposal Scope: Included / Planned Separately

For Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection, included items and additional works that may be planned as separate services are stated clearly in the proposal.

ScopeStatusExplanation
Site survey and preliminary assessmentIncluded depending on proposalPlanned to clarify the service scope and site need.
Periodic site visit and written action reportIncludedFindings, risk level and follow-up notes are prepared according to the contract/service scope.
Grounding measurement, thermal imaging, relay testing or transformer oil analysisCan be planned separatelyQuoted as a separate test/measurement work when required.
Revision, implementation, material supply or maintenance-repairSeparate serviceImplementation needs arising from the report are evaluated under a separate scope.

Out-of-Scope and Separately Planned Works

Bursa Fire Detection Periodic Inspection produces technical follow-up, reporting, compliance assessment and risk notification. The following works are planned separately when required; final risk level, cost and scope are not confirmed without an on-site survey.

Out-of-scope / separate workWhy is it evaluated separately?Pow-Sys approach
Grounding measurementIt may require measurement equipment, site time and a separate report.The need is stated in the main report; measurement work is planned separately.
Relay testing and selectivityRelay settings, test equipment, outage planning and separate engineering assessment may be required.Quoted as a separate testing/selectivity service when needed.
Thermal imaging inspectionIt requires imaging under load and a separate thermal finding report.Planned separately for panels, switchgear or connections where risk is observed.
Transformer maintenance and oil analysisIt may require maintenance crew, sampling, laboratory work or a separate test procedure.The need is written in the technical report; maintenance/testing is prepared as a separate scope.
Project revision, implementation and physical remediationIt creates material, labor, authority process or implementation responsibility.The main service reports the finding; implementation and contracting works are handled separately.

Claim and Official Source Mapping

Technical and regulatory statements are evaluated together with the official sources listed on the page. This table makes the relation between each claim and its supporting basis visible.

SourceClaim supported on the pageWhere it is used
EMO certificate verification and SMM/YGTIS sourcesAuthorized engineer assessment, certificate transparency and authorization confirmation are required at service start.Technical reviewer, authorization, certificate verification and proposal preparation sections.
Applicable electrical installation regulationsFinal site decision is clarified through on-site review, current documents and authorized engineer assessment.Information note, out-of-scope works and field data methodology sections.
TS EN, IEC, TEDAS, TEIAS, utility or relevant authority processesTesting, measurement, maintenance, authority approval or implementation works may be planned separately.Decision matrix, proposal scope, official sources and report output sections.

Update History and Editorial Review

Pow-Sys service pages are periodically reviewed for regulatory, technical practice and field reporting topics. If inaccurate or outdated information is noticed, reports are received through the correction policy.

DateWhat changed?Where is it shown?
May 2026Service scope, report outputs, pre-proposal information and trust notes were reviewed for the current period.Shown in the 'Last updated', 'What changed?' and update history areas.
After a correction requestInaccurate, incomplete or outdated information is technically reviewed.Necessary corrections are updated as page text, source links or explanatory notes.
Technical personnel testing a smoke detector with a test device within the scope of fire detection and alarm system function tests
In function tests, smoke and heat detectors, manual call points and audible-visual alarm devices are tested under conditions close to a real scenario, completing the fire detection system periodic inspection.
Anonymous technical report, checklist and follow-up output example
Standard report/control output: field finding, risk level, corrective action and follow-up date shown together.

Official Regulatory Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

How many times a year should fire detection system periodic inspection be performed?

According to the regulations and TS EN 54-14, if the manufacturer does not recommend a shorter period, the maximum interval is one year. In other words, periodic inspection and maintenance for fire detection and alarm systems must be performed at least once a year. More frequent checks are recommended in hazardous-class businesses and high-risk facilities.

Who performs fire detection system periodic inspection?

Periodic inspection of fire detection and alarm systems must be performed by persons authorized to carry out periodic inspections under the Regulation on Health and Safety Conditions in the Use of Work Equipment and meeting EKİPNET registration requirements. This includes engineers, technicians, senior technicians and technical teachers who meet the relevant requirements. When receiving inspection service, it is important to work with persons or organizations experienced in fire detection and alarm systems, using calibrated test devices and preparing reports in accordance with the legislation.

Does the system become completely disabled during inspection?

No. Periodic inspection and function tests are performed as far as possible without interrupting the operation of the system. During some tests, short-term sounder and warning activations may be given in a controlled way; this is planned in coordination with the business and carried out by considering critical production processes.

Is the periodic inspection report valid in official audits?

A fire detection system periodic inspection report prepared by an authorized person or authorized inspection body using calibrated test devices and considering the TS EN 54-14 approach, the Regulation on Fire Protection of Buildings and the Regulation on Health and Safety Conditions in the Use of Work Equipment is a strong technical supporting document in Ministry of Labor, organized industrial zone administration, fire brigade and insurance audits.

What is the risk of not having the inspection performed?

In systems that are not inspected regularly, detector contamination, incorrect installation, disabled zones or non-operating sounders may go unnoticed. This may cause delayed detection, evacuation delay and serious loss of life and property in a real fire. In addition, administrative sanctions, work stoppage decisions and problems in insurance claim processes may occur during official audits.

How are prices calculated?

Pricing is project-based according to panel type, number of loops and zones, number of detectors-call points-sounders, facility size, integration complexity such as smoke extraction, elevator and gas extinguishing, and location. Small systems require lower budgets, while complex fire safety systems such as organized industrial zone facilities require higher budgets. For a clear proposal, it is sufficient to contact us with your system information.

Is a fire detection system mandatory?

According to paragraph 3 of Article 75 of the Regulation on Fire Protection of Buildings, automatic fire detection devices must be installed in buildings whose building height or total enclosed area exceeds the values in Annex 7. Therefore, a fire detection system is legally mandatory in buildings exceeding certain height and enclosed area limits. Whether your business falls within this scope should be evaluated according to building usage class, building height and total enclosed area. In addition, in workplaces under Law No. 6331 and high fire-risk facilities, installing a fire detection system is strongly recommended even below the regulation thresholds.

Let us bring your project to life together.

Contact us now for a site survey and preliminary discussion.

Contact Us